Since the global financial crisis, sector-level bargaining has come under renewed scrutiny. While in Southern Europe, the crisis raised concerns about the role of collective bargaining as an obstacle to labour market adjustment, in Northern Europe it was perceived more favourably and, according to some, may even have helped to weather the fallout of the crisis more easily. This paper seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of sector-level bargaining systems and their role for labour market performance. We compare two countries with seemingly similar collective bargaining systems, the Netherlands and Portugal, and document a number of features that may affect labour market outcomes, including: i) the scope for flexibility at the firm or worker level within sector-level agreements; ii) the emphasis on representativeness as a criterion for extensions; iii) the effectiveness of coordination across bargaining units; and iv) pro-active government policies to enhance trust and cooperation between the social partners.
Keywords: industrial relations, social dialogue, employment.
JEL classifications: J5, P52.
Working paper no. 576
Collective bargaining through the magnifying glass: A comparison between the Netherlands and Portugal
Working Papers
Published: 21 November 2017
576 - Collective bargaining through the magnifying glass: A comparison between the Netherlands and Portugal
511KB PDF
Discover related articles
DNB uses cookies
We use cookies to optimise the user-friendliness of our website.
Read more about the cookies we use and the data they collect in our cookie notice.